Saying 3DCoat is overpriced for Indies seems unrational, with all of this in mind. 3DCoat is very close to ZBrush in terms of sculpting and yet has WAY better tools to Texture Paint, UV and Retopologize.
THERE'S YOUR INDIE LICENSE RIGHT THERE! Houdini charges that for just one year. But, come on, man, there is a sale going on right now that puts the Professional license at $280. The EDU/AMATEUR version is virtually 99.5% the same as the Professional version, and there is some means to use it commercially for making TF2 assets, IIRC.
3D COAT VOXEL SCULPTING GTX 1080 SOFTWARE
I tried telling them about that, but they ignored me.īut, again, EVERY software company has to assess what's right for them, not necessarily what you or I may prefer. I agree that "AMATEUR" has somewhat of a negative connotation among English speakers (at least here in the US) that Ukrainians (Pilgway is located in Kiev, Ukraine) probably aren't aware of. ZBrush's "Indie" license is a very stripped down version, called ZB Core. Try and get Autodesk to offer Indie Licenses, or Maxon/C4D. But let's not forget.not every 3D application or even plugins that cost WAY more than 3DCoat, offer Indie licenses. HoudiniFX costs roughly $5000 USD + Maintenance for a Professional license, therefore an Indie license might make sense for them. Indie licenses therefore might make more sense. Substance Painter.that only does texture painting (one subset of 3DCoat's arsenal of tools) costs $1000 USD or $1200/yr for Professionals. Let me give you an example of what I'm talking about. I'm sure they've seen the different offerings. Indie licenses for an already cheap software (for what it does) may not make sense to them. Every company offers what is feasible for their particular business.
(Can't edit posts and my arm hit something on my Wacom tablet to cause the last post to submit).anyhow, as I was saying, 3DCoat Professional is ALREADY priced in the Indie budget range.
0 kommentar(er)
